Great Lakes Law
Protecting Our Environment One Issue At A Time

What Exactly Is The U.S. Coast Guard Protecting?

Print the article

This entry was posted on 9/24/2006 10:03 AM and is filed under Great Lakes Ecology.

The U.S. Coast Guard plans to begin live fire exercises in the Great Lakes.  In the process, hundreds of pounds of toxic lead will be deposited into each of the Great Lakes.  Most businesses would be prohibited from such release of toxic lead into the environment but the Coast Guard hopes to avoid this prohibition by framing the new program as the creation of safety zones for the exercises, not the creation of the exercises themselves.

The U.S. Coast Guard has announced an extension of the rulemaking comment period for the proposed safety zone carve out in the Great Lakes for live fire exercises.

The Federal Register notice is: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/e
docket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-12332.pdf


This proposed rule is very misleading in that it frames the issue as the creation of safety zones rather than the creation of live fire exercises (which would naturally require safety zones).

By defining it this way there is obviously no environmental impact to consider from the firing of small arms and larger artillery in the Great Lakes. In other words, the proposed rule, creating safety zones, does not impact the Great Lakes ecosystem whereas the live fire exercise does have such an impact.

If the rule was framed as what it truly represents, the filling of the Great Lakes with lead containing ordinance, and possibly TNT and RDX containing artillery, then there would be an environmental impact to consider(and comment on).

This was a very tricky method for the Coast Guard to take on this issue. It does not put the impacted stakeholders on notice that the rule will affect them.

Our organization will be commenting on this misdirection and also the environmental requirements being ignored under NEPA, RCRA, CERCLA (future cleanup of current contamination), CWA, and the inconsistency with prior Great Lakes cleanup decisions such as the preliminary assessment and site investigation of artillery at Fort Sheridan under CERCLA, and the Chicago Gun Club Area of Concern near Chicago.

www.BlueEco.org
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    Leave a comment

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.